Menu
Personal finance
Online betting site Intrade abruptly closes

When work bulldozes your personal life

Women getting rejected for mortgages

Gas prices ate into Americans' budgets last month

Job burnout worse for your heart than smoking

Swiss tax-cheat adviser blows his US clients' cover

School loans are just the start for some Ph.D.s

Penn State suspends its contract with Adidas

Even Exxon thinks the US will cut energy use

How much water from Poland Spring is in that bottle?

Looking for tech's future? Watch teenagers

Do you live in a county that's dying?

Why Mila Kunis is hardly a stock market indicator

Matt Lauer hosting 'Jeopardy' could be hazardous

FTC tells celebrity endorsers on Twitter: Disclose all

No Guinness for vegans this St. Patrick's Day

Red Bull is being blackmailed

Lumber finally rises from the forest floor

Applying for Obamacare could be painful

US getting another conservative news channel

Carl's Jr. sticks with its 'indulgent' menu

Which 200 airports will lose their control towers?

How to lose $8 million in 6 minutes

First-class battle over Saturday mail delivery

Time's opus on health care is a surprise hit
Colorado doctors unite against energy companies
A controversy has placed Colorado doctors in opposition to oil and gas companies in the state. The issue concerns a confidentiality agreement physicians are supposed to sign that aims to protect those companies' trade secrets.


The agreement, known as Form 35, was established last year by the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment (CDPHE), along with the state's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Form 35 is supposed to protect the oil and gas companies from having health professionals reveal what the form calls "the specific identity of chemicals and the concentrations thereof." And except in the case of medical emergencies, doctors would need to submit a "written statement of need" to obtain that information.


But according to the Denver Post, no Colorado doctors have put their signatures on Form 35.


"I would have very mixed feelings about signing a form that tells me I could not be proactive about sharing this information with the health department," Michael Pramenko, a family physician in Grand Junction, Colo., and former president of the Colorado Medical Society, told the newspaper. "To me, if there's a chemical in the environment and there are potentially other people being exposed, it does not make sense, from a health standpoint, to not be sharing that information."


The chemicals in question are apparently the ones oil and gas companies use as part of the controversial process known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking."


Energy from Shale, a project funded by the American Petroleum Institute, describes fracking as the injecting of "fracturing fluids" under high pressure into underground rock formations to break up those formations and allow the extraction of oil and natural gas. "While 99.5% of the fluids used consist of water and sand, some chemicals are added to improve the flow," according to the site. "The composition of the chemical mixes varies from well to well."


CDPHE Director Dr. Chris Urbina told the Post that Form 35 "provides appropriate guidance and permission to health care providers needed to treat their patients."


But Dr. Mitchell Gershten, based in western Colorado, calls Form 35 a "gag order."


"There are spills happening all over the state, all the time," Gershten told the Post. "This is just about transparency so that nobody is harmed and the environment is not harmed. Why does it have to be so secretive?"
http://descuentalo.com.mx/tienda-online/interjet-mexico-promociones-boletos-baratos/
Julian Hooks
Colorado doctors unite against energy companies

Monster Beverage looks for a buzz from food stamps

Hungry for a hit, McDonald's adds McWraps

Real cost of US war with Iraq: $1.7 trillion

This guy spent $45,000 on a marriage proposal

Starbucks' CEO perks up for minimum wage hike

CEO gives workers 'get out of jail free' cards

Violent crime is haunting Mexico's tourism

Invest like Warren Buffett with this app

Peek protection: Now you can block that drone

Jay Leno is no laughing matter for NBC

Are job cuts a myth about Obamacare?

Nike silences naysayers after outstanding quarter

Menu
Are we finally ready for turkey burgers?

Newsroom budget cuts create a downward spiral

Why young Americans are getting poorer

Senator: Should hourly minimum wage be $22?

Cookie hoax: Girl Scouts scammed out of $24,000

NCAA March Madness is no economic slam dunk

Pennsylvania may finally sell its state liquor stores

Lululemon's see-through yoga pants get yanked

The Easter Bunny is getting pinched this year

How ski resorts fend off accident lawsuits

Retirement crisis ahead for boomers and Gen Xers

Soda industry wins support as donations flow

Colorado company: New gun law will make us move

Michael Dell may have another bidder to outdo

What the government wants to take away now

US is still paying Civil War benefits

Here come new whiskey flavors

College won't accept students who need loans

Who's next as a merger frenzy takes off?

Study: Soda really does kill

Dark day for a Chinese solar panel maker

Wal-Mart expands shop-with-iPhone program

Celebrating Passover costs more this year

Meth-contaminated homes are a growing hazard

What recovery? Many workers still stuck in recession